Schlegel v. Muscarella

254 A.D. 820, 5 N.Y.S.2d 198, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7766

This text of 254 A.D. 820 (Schlegel v. Muscarella) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schlegel v. Muscarella, 254 A.D. 820, 5 N.Y.S.2d 198, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7766 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Opinion

Judgment reversed on the law, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs, on the ground that no actionable negligence on the part of the defendant has been shown. (DeNeef v. Price, 249 App. Div. 924.) All concur, except Crosby, J., who dissents and votes for affirmance, and Dowling, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the facts and for granting a new trial. (The County Court judgment affirms a judgment for plaintiff, of the Justice Court of the town of Webster, in an automobile negligence action. Present — Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

DeNeef v. Price
249 A.D. 924 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
254 A.D. 820, 5 N.Y.S.2d 198, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7766, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schlegel-v-muscarella-nyappdiv-1938.