Schlegel v. Kienzle
238 A.D. 866
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1933·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed on the law and a new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the admission of the testimony concerning defendant’s injuries, to which exception was taken, and the charge of the court with reference to the duty of a passenger to protest were erroneous. Although as to the charge no direct exception was taken, the nature of the error makes a new trial necessary. (Nelson v. Nygren, 259 N. Y. 71.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Schlegel v. Kienzle, 238 A.D. 866 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).
238 A.D. 866 (Schlegel v. Kienzle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Alture v. 2061 Bryant Avenue Corp.
256 A.D. 1004 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1939)