Schlee v. State
590 So. 2d 1137, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 126, 1992 WL 1343
This text of 590 So. 2d 1137 (Schlee v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Schlee v. State, 590 So. 2d 1137, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 126, 1992 WL 1343 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s conviction but remand for sentencing correction. The written sentence must be corrected to reflect the trial court’s oral pronouncement that [1138]*1138appellant should be sentenced as a youthful offender. See Kelly v. State, 414 So.2d 1117 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Kelly v. State
414 So. 2d 1117 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
590 So. 2d 1137, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 126, 1992 WL 1343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schlee-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.