Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Schlee v. State

Schlee v. State

590 So. 2d 1137, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 126, 1992 WL 1343
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 8, 1992·No. No. 91-0230·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction but remand for sentencing correction. The written sentence must be corrected to reflect the trial court’s oral pronouncement that [1138]*1138appellant should be sentenced as a youthful offender. See Kelly v. State, 414 So.2d 1117 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982).

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and STONE and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schlee v. State, 590 So. 2d 1137, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 126, 1992 WL 1343 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

590 So. 2d 1137 (Schlee v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kelly v. State
414 So. 2d 1117 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)