Schlangen v. State

735 So. 2d 581, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8290, 1999 WL 414140
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 23, 1999·No. No. 98-00317·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PATTERSON, Judge.-

Cindy Schlangen appeals from her judgment and sentence for aggravated assault on an officer, battery on an officer, obstructing an officer with violence, and grand theft of a motor vehicle. We vacate her conviction and sentence for grand theft and affirm the remaining convictions.

At trial, the State proved that Mrs. Schlangen was a passenger in a truck which she probably knew was stolen. As the State concedes, this evidence was insufficient to support the grand theft conviction. “A person who is a passenger in a vehicle after the vehicle has been stolen, even if he knows the vehicle is stolen, cannot be convicted of grand theft.” Clayton v. State, 642 So.2d 53 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). Therefore, we vacate the conviction and sentence for grand theft of a motor vehicle and remand for resentencing on the remaining convictions, if appropriate.1

[582] Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

PARKER, C.J., and DAVIS, J., Concur.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schlangen v. State, 735 So. 2d 581, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8290, 1999 WL 414140 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

735 So. 2d 581 (Schlangen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

J. A. H. v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019
Canady v. State
813 So. 2d 161 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)