Schlamp v. Prince George's County

322 F. App'x 312
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 20, 2009
DocketNo. 08-2147
StatusPublished

This text of 322 F. App'x 312 (Schlamp v. Prince George's County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schlamp v. Prince George's County, 322 F. App'x 312 (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John Ryan Schlamp appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Schlamp’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Schlamp v. Prince George’s County, Maryland, No. 1:06-cv-01644-DKC (D.Md. Sept. 11, 2008).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
322 F. App'x 312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schlamp-v-prince-georges-county-ca4-2009.