Schlam Stone & Dolan, LLP v. Penquin Tenants Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schlam Stone & Dolan, LLP v. Penquin Tenants Corp.

71 A.D.3d 450, 894 N.Y.S.2d 876

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 9, 2010·Published

Opinion

Appeals having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from orders of the Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered on or about May 6, and May 7, 2009, and said appeals having been argued by counsel for the respective parties; and due deliberation having been had thereon, and upon the stipulation of the parties hereto dated Februaiy 24, 2010, it is unanimously ordered that said appeals be and the same are hereby withdrawn in accordance with the terms of the aforesaid stipulation. Concur — Friedman, J.P., McGuire, Acosta and DeGrasse, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from orders of the Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered on or about May 6, and May 7, 2009, and said appeals having been argued by counsel for the respective parties; and due deliberation having been had thereon, and upon the stipulation of the parties hereto dated Februaiy 24, 2010, it is unanimously ordered that said appeals be and the same are hereby withdrawn in accordance with the terms of the aforesaid stipulation. Concur — Friedman, J.P., McGuire, Acosta and DeGrasse, JJ.

Schlam Stone & Dolan, LLP v. Penquin Tenants Corp., 71 A.D.3d 450, 894 N.Y.S.2d 876 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

71 A.D.3d 450 (Schlam Stone & Dolan, LLP v. Penquin Tenants Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.