Schlage v. Barrett

259 A.D.2d 691, 686 N.Y.S.2d 845, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2703
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 22, 1999·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to set aside a deed to certain real property as fraudulently obtained, the plaintiff appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Leviss, J.H.O.), entered December 18, 1997, as, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, the defendants established her intent to make an inter vivos gift by clear and [692] convincing evidence (see, Gruen v Gruen, 68 NY2d 48, 53). Additionally, the plaintiff did not meet her burden of proving her incompetence at the time the gift was given (see, Smith v Comas, 173 AD2d 535; see also, Feiden v Feiden, 151 AD2d 889, 890).

The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Thompson and Joy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schlage v. Barrett, 259 A.D.2d 691, 686 N.Y.S.2d 845, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2703 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

259 A.D.2d 691 (Schlage v. Barrett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Estate of DelGatto
98 A.D.3d 975 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Olsen v. Evers
49 A.D.3d 615 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)