Schlaepfer v. Abend
This text of 110 N.Y.S. 1144 (Schlaepfer v. Abend) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Action to recover $401.25 for work, labor, and services between March 20 and April 29, 1907. Answer admits tender of goods $228.54. General denial as to balance. Pleadings oral. Defendants deposited in court $225 on account of the admitted indebtedness. Subsequently, as a condition for adjournments, the parties stipulated in writing as follows: “The defendants do hereby consent that the plaintiff receive, and withdraw the sum of $225 heretofore deposited with the clerk of this court, without any prejudice whatsoever against the plaintiff’s cause of action, and the clerk of this court is hereby authorized to pay said $225 to the plaintiff or his attorney.” It was so ordered, and money so paid. Upon the trial without a jury defendant had judgment with costs. Plaintiff appeals. The issues involved disputed items aggregating $168.02. As to the tender of goods to plaintiff, they are still with defendants, who testified. that plaintiff refused to receive them. Plaintiff testified that no complaint was made as to the goods manufactured by him for defendants, whose testimony related to details of trilling consequence. At the close of the trial there was a colloquy: “The Court: I understand the defendants consent that, in case judgment is found for defendants, they will deliver the goods on payment of $13.-50. Plaintiff’s Counsel: I ask your honor to notice the stipulation under which $225 was withdrawn without prejudice to plaintiff’s cause of action.” We think plaintiff proved his case, and was entitled to $393.02, less .deposit withdrawn, $225—$168.02. Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
110 N.Y.S. 1144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schlaepfer-v-abend-nyappterm-1908.