Schlacter v. Dowling
28 N.E.2d 724, 283 N.Y. 721, 1940 N.Y. LEXIS 1155
Opinion
*722 Judgment affirmed, with costs. The plaintiff having conceded the correctness of the report of the weather bureau, there was no substantial evidence that the water upon the subway platform was the cause, as plaintiff claimed, of the occurrence which resulted in the death of the intestate. No opinion.
Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Finch, Sears, Lewis and Conway, JJ. Rippey, J., dissents on the ground a question of fact was presented.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Schlacter v. Dowling, 28 N.E.2d 724, 283 N.Y. 721, 1940 N.Y. LEXIS 1155 (N.Y. 1940).
28 N.E.2d 724 (Schlacter v. Dowling) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Abair v. City of New York
269 A.D. 780 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1945)