Schlacter v. Dowling

New York Court of Appeals

Schlacter v. Dowling

28 N.E.2d 724, 283 N.Y. 721, 1940 N.Y. LEXIS 1155

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 24, 1940

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 28 N.E.2d 724 (Schlacter v. Dowling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schlacter v. Dowling, 28 N.E.2d 724, 283 N.Y. 721, 1940 N.Y. LEXIS 1155 (N.Y. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

*722 Judgment affirmed, with costs. The plaintiff having conceded the correctness of the report of the weather bureau, there was no substantial evidence that the water upon the subway platform was the cause, as plaintiff claimed, of the occurrence which resulted in the death of the intestate. No opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Finch, Sears, Lewis and Conway, JJ. Rippey, J., dissents on the ground a question of fact was presented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*722 Judgment affirmed, with costs. The plaintiff having conceded the correctness of the report of the weather bureau, there was no substantial evidence that the water upon the subway platform was the cause, as plaintiff claimed, of the occurrence which resulted in the death of the intestate. No opinion.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Finch, Sears, Lewis and Conway, JJ. Rippey, J., dissents on the ground a question of fact was presented.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 N.E.2d 724, 283 N.Y. 721, 1940 N.Y. LEXIS 1155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schlacter-v-dowling-ny-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack