Schirtz v. Wild
18 A.D.2d 874, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4948
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 10, 1963
StatusPublished
This text of 18 A.D.2d 874 (Schirtz v. Wild) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Schirtz v. Wild, 18 A.D.2d 874, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4948 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).
Opinion
Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party, (Appeal by defendant Arthur Jacobs from judgment of Onondaga Trial Term in favor of plaintiff against defendant Jacobs in an automobile negligence action. The order denied a motion for a new trial.) Present — Williams, P. J., Goldman, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
18 A.D.2d 874, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4948, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schirtz-v-wild-nyappdiv-1963.