Schirrmeister v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schirrmeister v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority

47 A.D.2d 732, 368 N.Y.S.2d 453, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8996

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 13, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 47 A.D.2d 732 (Schirrmeister v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schirrmeister v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority, 47 A.D.2d 732, 368 N.Y.S.2d 453, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8996 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

[733]*733Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered June 25, 1974, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, and a new trial granted solely on the issue of damages, with $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal to abide the event, unless the plaintiffs-respondents within 20 days of service upon them by the defendants-appellants of a copy of the order entered hereon, with notice of entry, serve and file in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdicts, and to the entry of an amended judgment, as follows: Karin Sehirrmeister $140,000 Erich Sehirrmeister $20,000. If the plaintiffs-respondents consent to the reductions, the judgment as so amended and reduced is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The amounts awarded by the jury were excessive and a judgment exceeding the amounts indicated is not warranted on this record. Concur— Stevens, J. P., Lupiano, Capozzoli and Lane, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[733]*733Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered June 25, 1974, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, and a new trial granted solely on the issue of damages, with $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal to abide the event, unless the plaintiffs-respondents within 20 days of service upon them by the defendants-appellants of a copy of the order entered hereon, with notice of entry, serve and file in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdicts, and to the entry of an amended judgment, as follows: Karin Sehirrmeister $140,000 Erich Sehirrmeister $20,000. If the plaintiffs-respondents consent to the reductions, the judgment as so amended and reduced is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The amounts awarded by the jury were excessive and a judgment exceeding the amounts indicated is not warranted on this record. Concur— Stevens, J. P., Lupiano, Capozzoli and Lane, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

47 A.D.2d 732, 368 N.Y.S.2d 453, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8996, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schirrmeister-v-manhattan-bronx-surface-transit-operating-authority-nyappdiv-1975.