Schipersky v. Gartner

Appellate Court of Illinois

Schipersky v. Gartner

202 Ill. App. 337

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedDecember 30, 1916

DocketGen. No. 21,857

StatusPublished

This text of 202 Ill. App. 337 (Schipersky v. Gartner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schipersky v. Gartner, 202 Ill. App. 337 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Appeal and ebbor, § 1488*—when admission of improper evidence 5y master not ground for reversal. In an equity suit, held that the defendant’s objection that improper evidence was heard by the master need not he considered where the defendant’s objection to such evidence was sustained by the master and he reported that he had not considered it in reaching his conclusions and there was evidence apart therefrom sufficient to warrant his conclusions and findings of fact.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Appeal and ebbor, § 1488*—when admission of improper evidence 5y master not ground for reversal. In an equity suit, held that the defendant’s objection that improper evidence was heard by the master need not he considered where the defendant’s objection to such evidence was sustained by the master and he reported that he had not considered it in reaching his conclusions and there was evidence apart therefrom sufficient to warrant his conclusions and findings of fact.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

202 Ill. App. 337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schipersky-v-gartner-illappct-1916.