Schinzel v. Best
109 A.D. 917
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1905·Published·Cited by 8 cases
Opinion
Interlocutory judgment [918] affirmed, with costs, on the opinion of Mr. Justice Maddox at Special Term. (Reported in 45 Misc. Rep. 455.) Hirschberg, P. J., Jenks, Hooker, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Schinzel v. Best, 109 A.D. 917 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).
109 A.D. 917 (Schinzel v. Best) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brooklyn-Manhattan Transit Corp. v. City of New York
221 A.D. 106 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1927)
New York Consolidated Railroad v. City of New York
204 A.D. 171 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1922)
City of New York v. . Brooklyn City R.R. Co.
134 N.E. 533 (New York Court of Appeals, 1922)
City of New York v. Brooklyn City Railroad
198 A.D. 737 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1921)
City of New York v. Brooklyn, Queens County & Suburban Railroad
179 A.D. 198 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1917)
In re New York Railways Co.
172 A.D. 128 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1916)
People ex rel. Bridge Operating Co. v. Public Service Commission
153 A.D. 129 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1912)