Schinstine v. Schinstine
9 So. 3d 777, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 6919, 2009 WL 1533017
Opinion
DISMISSED. See Quarterman v. McNeil, 1 So.3d 392, 393 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (noting that had the order on appeal been a final order the motion for rehearing would have delayed rendition); Dep’t of Revenue ex rel. Chambers v. Travis, 971 So.2d 157, 159 n. 2 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (noting Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.020(h) provides that certain motions delay rendition of any final orders).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Schinstine v. Schinstine, 9 So. 3d 777, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 6919, 2009 WL 1533017 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).
9 So. 3d 777 (Schinstine v. Schinstine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Quarterman v. McNeil
1 So. 3d 392 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
STATE, DEPT. OF REVENUE v. Travis
971 So. 2d 157 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)