Schinstine v. Schinstine

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Schinstine v. Schinstine

9 So. 3d 777, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 6919, 2009 WL 1533017

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 3, 2009

Docket1D09-1203

StatusPublished

This text of 9 So. 3d 777 (Schinstine v. Schinstine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schinstine v. Schinstine, 9 So. 3d 777, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 6919, 2009 WL 1533017 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Quarterman v. McNeil, 1 So.3d 392, 393 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (noting that had the order on appeal been a final order the motion for rehearing would have delayed rendition); Dep’t of Revenue ex rel. Chambers v. Travis, 971 So.2d 157, 159 n. 2 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (noting Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.020(h) provides that certain motions delay rendition of any final orders).

BENTON, LEWIS, and CLARK, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Quarterman v. McNeil, 1 So.3d 392, 393 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (noting that had the order on appeal been a final order the motion for rehearing would have delayed rendition); Dep’t of Revenue ex rel. Chambers v. Travis, 971 So.2d 157, 159 n. 2 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (noting Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.020(h) provides that certain motions delay rendition of any final orders).

BENTON, LEWIS, and CLARK, JJ„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 So. 3d 777, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 6919, 2009 WL 1533017, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schinstine-v-schinstine-fladistctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack