Schindo v. Antinozzi

13 A.D.2d 811, 216 N.Y.S.2d 37, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10914
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1961·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action for partition, the plaintiff appeals from a final judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered November 1, 1960, and brings up for review, pursuant to section 580 of the Civil Practice Act, the interlocutory judgment of the same court, entered May 5, 1960. The final judgment confirmed the report of the three commissioners appointed by the interlocutory judgment, and directed a physical division of the subject premises between the parties and an equalization payment by defendant to the plaintiff. Plaintiff contends: (1) that the direction for a physical partition of the premises instead of their sale was erroneous; (2) that the equalization payment was inadequate; and (3) that the fees awarded the commissioners were grossly excessive. Judgments affirmed, with costs. The record does not disclose any objection by plaintiff to the fees of the commissioners, as set forth in their report, on the motion for confirmation. Nolan, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Pette, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schindo v. Antinozzi, 13 A.D.2d 811, 216 N.Y.S.2d 37, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10914 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

13 A.D.2d 811 (Schindo v. Antinozzi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schwartz v. Meisner
198 A.D.2d 634 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)