Schindley, Wanda Higbee
This text of Schindley, Wanda Higbee (Schindley, Wanda Higbee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. PD-1392-10
WANDA HIGBEE SCHINDLEY, Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS
ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
FROM THE SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS
FRANKLIN COUNTY
Per curiam. Keasler, and Hervey, J.J., dissent.
O R D E R
The petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.4(i) because it contains an incomplete copy of the opinion of the court of appeals.
The petition is struck. See Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.6.
The petitioner may redraw the petition. The redrawn petition and copies must be filed in the Court of Criminal Appeals within thirty days after the date of this order.
Filed: November 10, 2010
Do Not Publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Schindley, Wanda Higbee, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schindley-wanda-higbee-texcrimapp-2010.