Schindley, Wanda Higbee

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 10, 2010·No. PD-1392-10·Published

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS




NO. PD-1392-10




WANDA HIGBEE SCHINDLEY, Appellant


v.


THE STATE OF TEXAS




ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

FRANKLIN COUNTY




                        Per curiam. Keasler, and Hervey, J.J., dissent.


O R D E R


           The petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.4(i) because it contains an incomplete copy of the opinion of the court of appeals.

           The petition is struck. See Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.6.

           The petitioner may redraw the petition. The redrawn petition and copies must be filed in the Court of Criminal Appeals within thirty days after the date of this order.



Filed: November 10, 2010

Do Not Publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schindley, Wanda Higbee, (Tex. 2010).

Schindley, Wanda Higbee (Schindley, Wanda Higbee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.