Schindler v. Sperling

155 N.Y.S. 348
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedNovember 3, 1915
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 155 N.Y.S. 348 (Schindler v. Sperling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schindler v. Sperling, 155 N.Y.S. 348 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Opinion

SHEARN, J.

The action is for goods sold and delivered. Defendant ordered a quantity of white sewing thread. The cotton was on cones, examined by defendant when the order was given on January 20, 1915. Defendant ordered an additional quantity on February 6th, and placed a third order on February 10th. All the deliveries were promptly made, and there was no- complaint. Defendant used the thread h> manufacture fringes, and after having shipped out finished goods the discovery was made that the cotton thread was yellow, instead of white. There is no claim of defect in quality, or that there was any hidden defect. The color was obvious on inspection, and no reason is assigned why it was not discoverable when being used in defendant’s factory. The retention and use of the goods after a reasonable opportunity of observing their color was an acceptance. The only right which survived acceptance was a claim for damages; but there was no proof of any difference in value between white cotton and yellow cotton, and the counterclaim was properly dismissed.

Judgment reversed, with $30 costs, and judgment is directed in favor of the plaintiff for $38.37, with interest from February 10, 1915, and appropriate costs in the court below. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dume v. Clydesdale Truck Sales Corp.
119 Misc. 590 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
155 N.Y.S. 348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schindler-v-sperling-nyappterm-1915.