Schindler v. Schindler

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Schindler v. Schindler

142 So. 790, 175 La. 29, 1932 La. LEXIS 1785

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMay 23, 1932

DocketNo. 30949.

StatusPublished

This text of 142 So. 790 (Schindler v. Schindler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schindler v. Schindler, 142 So. 790, 175 La. 29, 1932 La. LEXIS 1785 (La. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

O’NIELL, C. J.

The plaintiff has appealed from a judgment rejecting her demand for a separation from bed and board on the ground of cruel treatment. She testified to one instance of cruelty on the part of her husband, but he denied the charge. There was no other testimony offered by either of the parties. The judge who heard their testimony found the facts to be in favor of the defendant; and, having read the testimony, we have come to the same conclusion.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O’NIELL, C. J.

The plaintiff has appealed from a judgment rejecting her demand for a separation from bed and board on the ground of cruel treatment. She testified to one instance of cruelty on the part of her husband, but he denied the charge. There was no other testimony offered by either of the parties. The judge who heard their testimony found the facts to be in favor of the defendant; and, having read the testimony, we have come to the same conclusion.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

142 So. 790, 175 La. 29, 1932 La. LEXIS 1785, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schindler-v-schindler-la-1932.