Schiming v. State
This text of 534 So. 2d 1252 (Schiming v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
At the close of the evidence, the defendant (Schiming) requested a jury charge on false imprisonment as a lesser included offense which was denied by the trial court. Schiming was ultimately found guilty of attempted first degree murder, sexual battery, kidnapping, armed robbery and possession of a weapon in the commission of a felony.
[1253]*1253Pursuant to State v. Sanborn, 533 So.2d 1169 (Fla.1988), the conviction for kidnapping is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial on the kidnapping charge plus resentencing. In all other respects the decision of the trial court is affirmed.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
534 So. 2d 1252, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 160, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5638, 1988 WL 135844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schiming-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.