Schimelfenig v. Com., Board of Law Examiners
969 A.2d 1176, 600 Pa. 627, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 505
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 31, 2009
Docket147 EM 2008
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 969 A.2d 1176 (Schimelfenig v. Com., Board of Law Examiners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Schimelfenig v. Com., Board of Law Examiners, 969 A.2d 1176, 600 Pa. 627, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 505 (Pa. 2009).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 31st day of March, 2009, the Petition for Review is GRANTED. The parties are directed to brief the following issues:
1) Whether, in the particular circumstances here, Petitioner should be deemed to have substantially complied with Pa.B.A.R. 204; and
2) If not, whether our present Rule 204, which conditions admission for an out-state-attorney on whether that attorney has either taken the bar examination or practiced law for the past five out of seven years in a state that allows Pennsylvania attorneys to be admitted reciprocally, should be reconsidered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In Re Estate of Slomski
969 A.2d 1176 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2009)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
969 A.2d 1176, 600 Pa. 627, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schimelfenig-v-com-board-of-law-examiners-pa-2009.