Schiltz v. Kupper

204 N.W.2d 680, 57 Wis. 2d 760, 1973 Wisc. LEXIS 1601
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided February 27, 1973·No. No. 319·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff complains of a comment made by the trial judge, who questioned the expert’s testimony that weight did not enter into his calculations as to the speed of defendant’s car. The expert explained that the weight factor canceled itself. The trial judge then instructed the jury to disregard his statement. Plaintiff’s counsel did not move for a mistrial.

Plaintiff argues that the statement made by the trial judge could not be erased by his instruction to the jury to disregard it. We conclude that plaintiff has not demonstrated prejudice. Plaintiff’s counsel was satisfied at the time to go on with the case. The most likely basis upon which the jury found defendant negligent was excessive speed.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schiltz v. Kupper, 204 N.W.2d 680, 57 Wis. 2d 760, 1973 Wisc. LEXIS 1601 (Wis. 1973).

204 N.W.2d 680 (Schiltz v. Kupper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.