Schilter v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Schilter v. State

904 So. 2d 634, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 9698, 2005 WL 1459439

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 22, 2005·No. No. 3D04-1128·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Steven Schilter appeals his revocation of probation and sentence entered following his entry of an admission to a violation of probation. Appellant contends that he is entitled to additional credit for time served. However, that issue was not raised by a proper motion to correct sentencing error under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b). We affirm the judgment and sentence without prejudice for appellant to pursue his pending (but prematurely filed) pro se motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) wherein he seeks additional credit for time served. See Archambault v. State, 781 So.2d 1194 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Steven Schilter appeals his revocation of probation and sentence entered following his entry of an admission to a violation of probation. Appellant contends that he is entitled to additional credit for time served. However, that issue was not raised by a proper motion to correct sentencing error under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b). We affirm the judgment and sentence without prejudice for appellant to pursue his pending (but prematurely filed) pro se motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) wherein he seeks additional credit for time served. See Archambault v. State, 781 So.2d 1194 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).

Affirmed.

Schilter v. State, 904 So. 2d 634, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 9698, 2005 WL 1459439 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

904 So. 2d 634 (Schilter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related