Schilter v. State
This text of 904 So. 2d 634 (Schilter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant Steven Schilter appeals his revocation of probation and sentence entered following his entry of an admission to a violation of probation. Appellant contends that he is entitled to additional credit for time served. However, that issue was not raised by a proper motion to correct sentencing error under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b). We affirm the judgment and sentence without prejudice for appellant to pursue his pending (but prematurely filed) pro se motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) wherein he seeks additional credit for time served. See Archambault v. State, 781 So.2d 1194 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
904 So. 2d 634, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 9698, 2005 WL 1459439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schilter-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.