Schillinger v. Schneier

Missouri Court of Appeals

Schillinger v. Schneier

391 S.W.3d 887, 2013 WL 69263, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 14

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 8, 2013·No. No. ED 98001·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

John D. Schneier appeals from the judgment, entered on December 8, 2011, reviving judgments entered in 2000 and 2001 against him and in favor of George and Nancy Schillinger. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

John D. Schneier appeals from the judgment, entered on December 8, 2011, reviving judgments entered in 2000 and 2001 against him and in favor of George and Nancy Schillinger. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Schillinger v. Schneier, 391 S.W.3d 887, 2013 WL 69263, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 14 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

391 S.W.3d 887 (Schillinger v. Schneier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.