Schiller v. State
960 So. 2d 12, 2007 WL 957359
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 2, 2007
Docket1D07-0721
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 960 So. 2d 12 (Schiller v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Schiller v. State, 960 So. 2d 12, 2007 WL 957359 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).
Opinion
Anthony L. SCHILLER, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Anthony L. Schiller, pro se, Petitioner.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.
KAHN, POLSTON, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Fenton v. State
960 So. 2d 12 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
960 So. 2d 12, 2007 WL 957359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schiller-v-state-fladistctapp-2007.