Schiller v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Schiller v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad

110 N.Y.S. 1144

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 3, 1908

StatusPublished

This text of 110 N.Y.S. 1144 (Schiller v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schiller v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad, 110 N.Y.S. 1144 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The action is brought to recover damages for delay in -forwarding the plaintiff’s baggage from Brockton, Mass., to New York City. By reason of such delay it was shown by the plaintiff that he was unable to fulfill an engagement in Pittsburg, Pa. The contract he put in evidence showed that the salary he was to receive for the week’s engagement he was compelled to lose was $250. The trial.justice gave damages in the sum of $100. There is nothing in the record to warrant a finding in such an amount. Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide .the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The action is brought to recover damages for delay in -forwarding the plaintiff’s baggage from Brockton, Mass., to New York City. By reason of such delay it was shown by the plaintiff that he was unable to fulfill an engagement in Pittsburg, Pa. The contract he put in evidence showed that the salary he was to receive for the week’s engagement he was compelled to lose was $250. The trial.justice gave damages in the sum of $100. There is nothing in the record to warrant a finding in such an amount. Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide .the event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

110 N.Y.S. 1144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schiller-v-new-york-new-haven-hartford-railroad-nyappterm-1908.