Schiller v. Giles
This text of 614 P.2d 151 (Schiller v. Giles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
During the arguments in this case we were made aware that after the allowance of defendant Giles’ summary judgment on plaintiffs’ amended complaint, there remained pending Giles’ counterclaim for breach of contract and tort, as well as plaintiffs’ action against the co-defendant and his counterclaims against them. There was neither a final order under ORS 19.010 nor an order permitting an interlocutory appeal under ORS 18.125(1).
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
614 P.2d 151, 47 Or. App. 517, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 3208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schiller-v-giles-orctapp-1980.