Schiller v. FARM BUREAU MUT. INS. CO. OF MICHIGAN

Michigan Supreme Court

Schiller v. FARM BUREAU MUT. INS. CO. OF MICHIGAN

703 N.W.2d 472, 2005 WL 2293627

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 21, 2005

Docket127794

StatusPublished

This text of 703 N.W.2d 472 (Schiller v. FARM BUREAU MUT. INS. CO. OF MICHIGAN) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schiller v. FARM BUREAU MUT. INS. CO. OF MICHIGAN, 703 N.W.2d 472, 2005 WL 2293627 (Mich. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

703 N.W.2d 472 (2005)

SCHILLER v. FARM BUREAU MUT. INS. CO. OF MICHIGAN.

No. 127794.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

September 21, 2005.

Application for Leave to Appeal

SC: 127794, COA: 258344.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 2, 2004 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the case of Cameron v. Auto Club Insurance Association (Docket No. 127018) is pending on appeal before this Court and that the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in that case. The proceedings in the Washtenaw Circuit Court shall be STAYED while this application remains pending. Defendant's motion for immediate consideration of its motion to consolidate is GRANTED. The motion to consolidate is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

703 N.W.2d 472 (2005)

SCHILLER v. FARM BUREAU MUT. INS. CO. OF MICHIGAN.

No. 127794.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

September 21, 2005.

Application for Leave to Appeal

SC: 127794, COA: 258344.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 2, 2004 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the case of Cameron v. Auto Club Insurance Association (Docket No. 127018) is pending on appeal before this Court and that the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in that case. The proceedings in the Washtenaw Circuit Court shall be STAYED while this application remains pending. Defendant's motion for immediate consideration of its motion to consolidate is GRANTED. The motion to consolidate is DENIED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

703 N.W.2d 472, 2005 WL 2293627, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schiller-v-farm-bureau-mut-ins-co-of-michigan-mich-2005.