Schiller v. City of Glendale

208 Cal. 788
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 5, 1929
DocketL. A. No. 10098
StatusPublished

This text of 208 Cal. 788 (Schiller v. City of Glendale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schiller v. City of Glendale, 208 Cal. 788 (Cal. 1929).

Opinion

THE COURT.

cause relates to street improvement proceedings which, although instituted under a resolution of intention bearing a different number, are otherwise identical with and were started the same day as those referred to in ease No. 10085, Woodill v. City of Glendale, ante, p. 564 [282 Pac. 797], this day decided. The pleadings in the two actions are in the same form and the law points made are identical. Therefore, upon authority of said cause, Woodill v. City of Glendale, supra, and upon the same grounds and for all the reasons set forth therein, the judgment rendered in this cause for defendants upon the sustaining of their demurrers, without leave to amend, is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Woodill v. City of Glendale
282 P. 797 (California Supreme Court, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
208 Cal. 788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schiller-v-city-of-glendale-cal-1929.