Schillace v. Price Co.
This text of 231 A.D.2d 879 (Schillace v. Price Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Upon our review of the record, we conclude that plaintiff presented sufficient evidence at trial to support the jury award for future lost wages. Plaintiff’s proof "allow[ed] the loss of earnings to be ascertained with reasonable certainty” (Burdick v Bratt, 203 AD2d 950, 951, lv denied 84 NY2d 801, citing Reichman v Warehouse One, 173 AD2d 250, 252, lv dismissed in part and denied in part 78 NY2d 1058). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Michalek, J.— Damages.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Fallon, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
231 A.D.2d 879, 648 N.Y.S.2d 397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schillace-v-price-co-nyappdiv-1996.