Schildkraut v. Mentcher
227 A.D. 604
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 15, 1929
StatusPublished
This text of 227 A.D. 604 (Schildkraut v. Mentcher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Schildkraut v. Mentcher, 227 A.D. 604 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).
Opinion
Order directing payment of monthly rental during pendency of action reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The court was without authority to make the order herein. (La Bau v. Huetwohl, 60 Hun, 407.) Kapper, Hagarty, Seeger, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
La Bau v. Huetwohl
15 N.Y.S. 491 (New York Supreme Court, 1891)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
227 A.D. 604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schildkraut-v-mentcher-nyappdiv-1929.