Schildkraut v. Higgins

234 A.D. 706

This text of 234 A.D. 706 (Schildkraut v. Higgins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schildkraut v. Higgins, 234 A.D. 706 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

Order denying, on reargument, plaintiff’s motion for leave to serve an amended complaint reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten doUars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, without costs. The amended complaint should be served within ten days from the entry of the order herein. The original complaint set out the obUgation of the guarantor, Umansky, and the degree of UabiUty thereon. The extinguishment of the lien by reason of the first mortgage action left unaffected this obUgation and this result ensued without fault on the part of the plaintiff herein. He should, therefore, be allowed to serve an amended complaint restating the same obligation on the guaranty as is set out in the original complaint, with a more [707]*707apt prayer for relief, especially since that obligation on the guaranty was allowed to stand undenied when contained in the original complaint. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
234 A.D. 706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schildkraut-v-higgins-nyappdiv-1931.