Home/New York Court of Appeals/Schildhaus v. City of New York

Schildhaus v. City of New York

171 N.E.2d 874, 8 N.Y.2d 1108
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 17, 1960
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 171 N.E.2d 874 (Schildhaus v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schildhaus v. City of New York, 171 N.E.2d 874, 8 N.Y.2d 1108 (N.Y. 1960).

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rosario v. Amalgamated Ladies' Garment Cutters' Union, Local 10
605 F.2d 1228 (Second Circuit, 1979)
Thomas Rosario, Ovidio Vega and Ray Cabel v. Amalgamated Ladies' Garment Cutters' Union, Local 10, I.L.G.W.U., Abe Dolgen, Individually and as Manager of Amalgamated Ladies' Garment Cutters' Union, Local 10, I.L.G.W.U., and the City of New York, Thomas Rosario, Ovidio Vega and Ray Cabel v. Amalgamated Ladies' Garment Cutters' Union, Local 10, I.L.G.W.U., and International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, Afl-Cio
605 F.2d 1228 (Second Circuit, 1979)
White v. State
67 A.D.2d 1015 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
171 N.E.2d 874, 8 N.Y.2d 1108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schildhaus-v-city-of-new-york-ny-1960.