Schild v. Quality Furs, Inc.
This text of 10 Misc. 2d 946 (Schild v. Quality Furs, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A triable issue was presented as to whether or not plaintiffs’ representative agreed to abide by the recommendation of the creditors’ committee or accepted the compromise plan recommended by the committee. This is a material triable issue, since proof of such agreement or acceptance would operate as a bar to plaintiffs’ recovery. Acceptance of a composition with other creditors is a valid agreement which discharges the original debt. (White v. Kuntz, 107 N. Y. 518, 522; Chemical Nat. Bank of N. Y. v. Kohner, 58 How. Prac. 267, revd. 85 N. Y. 189; Heinzer v. Klyberg, 87 Misc. 315.)
The judgment and order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and motion denied.
Hofstadter, Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ., concur.
Judgment and order reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 Misc. 2d 946, 170 N.Y.S.2d 107, 1958 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schild-v-quality-furs-inc-nyappterm-1958.