Schild Adelstein Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Schild Adelstein Co. v. United States

35 Cust. Ct. 235

United States Customs Court·Decided September 9, 1955·No. No. 59271; protest 865345-G (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of lambskin plates the same in all material respects as those the subject of A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc. v. United States (33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1643, supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of lambskin plates the same in all material respects as those the subject of A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc. v. United States (33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1643, supra.

Schild Adelstein Co. v. United States, 35 Cust. Ct. 235 (cusc 1955).

Pincite

35 Cust. Ct. 235 (Schild Adelstein Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related