Schiffman v. City of Long Beach
This text of 26 Misc. 2d 830 (Schiffman v. City of Long Beach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion to dismiss the complaint is granted with leave to serve an amended complaint within 10 days after the service of a copy of the order.
The plaintiff, Blanche Schiffman, fell on a public sidewalk in the City of Long Beach. The complaint alleges negligent maintenance by the city, but no allegation of written notice of [831]*831the defective condition of the sidewalk is pleaded, as required by section 256-a of the Charter of the City of Long Beach. Therefore, the complaint must be dismissed. (Ellis v. City of Geneva, 259 App. Div. 502, affd. 288 N. Y. 478; Fullerton v. City of Schenectady, 285 App. Div. 545, affd. 309 N. Y. 701; Skelly v. Village of Port Chester, 6 A D 2d 717; Feinson v. City of Long Beach, 137 N. Y. S. 2d 98.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 Misc. 2d 830, 208 N.Y.S.2d 811, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2072, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schiffman-v-city-of-long-beach-nysupct-1960.