Schiff v. Lichtenstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schiff v. Lichtenstein

247 A.D. 781

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1936·Published

Opinion

The action is predicated upon a promissory note made by defendants on or about October 26, 1928, whereby they promised to pay to the order of Rita K. Israel $1,500 with interest on December 26, 1928. Rita K. Israel assigned said note to plaintiff after maturity. Order granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment as against the defendant-appellant, and the judgment entered thereon, unanimously reversed, with costs, and the motion denied, upon the ground that the allegations of the answer taken in connection with the affidavit in opposition to the motion sufficiently establish that there is a triable issue. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The action is predicated upon a promissory note made by defendants on or about October 26, 1928, whereby they promised to pay to the order of Rita K. Israel $1,500 with interest on December 26, 1928. Rita K. Israel assigned said note to plaintiff after maturity. Order granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment as against the defendant-appellant, and the judgment entered thereon, unanimously reversed, with costs, and the motion denied, upon the ground that the allegations of the answer taken in connection with the affidavit in opposition to the motion sufficiently establish that there is a triable issue. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Schiff v. Lichtenstein, 247 A.D. 781 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

247 A.D. 781 (Schiff v. Lichtenstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.