Schiff v. American Pacemaker Corp.

134 A.D.2d 422, 520 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50607

This text of 134 A.D.2d 422 (Schiff v. American Pacemaker Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schiff v. American Pacemaker Corp., 134 A.D.2d 422, 520 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50607 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant American Pacemaker Corp., Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Levine, J.), dated February 5, 1986, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing all claims against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The appellant failed to make a showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by tendering sufficient evidence to eliminate any material issues of fact from the case (see, Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Center, 64 NY2d 851, on remand 111 AD2d 138). Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Fiber, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Winegrad v. New York University Medical Center
476 N.E.2d 642 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
Winegrad v. New York University Medical Center
111 A.D.2d 138 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
134 A.D.2d 422, 520 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schiff-v-american-pacemaker-corp-nyappdiv-1987.