Schierloh v. Wood

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schierloh v. Wood

230 A.D. 788

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 15, 1930·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Peremptory mandamus order unanimously affirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. The refusal of the Special Term to find as requested by the petitioner in paragraph numbered 5 of the conclusions of .law is reversed, and this court makes the following conclusion of law: “ 5. That the Zoning Ordinance of the Village of Tuekahoe is entirely illegal and void by reason of the failure of the Board of Trustees of the Village of Tuekahoe to publish a notice of the public hearing pursuant to section 178 of the Village Law.” Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peremptory mandamus order unanimously affirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. The refusal of the Special Term to find as requested by the petitioner in paragraph numbered 5 of the conclusions of .law is reversed, and this court makes the following conclusion of law: “ 5. That the Zoning Ordinance of the Village of Tuekahoe is entirely illegal and void by reason of the failure of the Board of Trustees of the Village of Tuekahoe to publish a notice of the public hearing pursuant to section 178 of the Village Law.” Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ. Settle order on notice.

Schierloh v. Wood, 230 A.D. 788 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

230 A.D. 788 (Schierloh v. Wood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related