Schierloh v. Kelly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schierloh v. Kelly

250 A.D. 764, 295 N.Y.S. 125, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8892

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 1, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 250 A.D. 764 (Schierloh v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schierloh v. Kelly, 250 A.D. 764, 295 N.Y.S. 125, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8892 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for damages claimed to have resulted from the alleged malicious prosecution of civil actions, order vacating a demand served by defendants for a bill of particulars as to certain allegations contained in the complaint reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, motion to vacate denied, and plaintiff directed to furnish a bill of particulars as to items 3-B to 3-H, both inclusive, 9-D to 9-H, both inclusive, and 11-A, specified in defendants’ notice of demand. The bill of particulars is to be served within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. In our opinion, these items are proper subjects for a bill of particulars and as to them the plaintiff’s motion to vacate should have been denied. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for damages claimed to have resulted from the alleged malicious prosecution of civil actions, order vacating a demand served by defendants for a bill of particulars as to certain allegations contained in the complaint reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, motion to vacate denied, and plaintiff directed to furnish a bill of particulars as to items 3-B to 3-H, both inclusive, 9-D to 9-H, both inclusive, and 11-A, specified in defendants’ notice of demand. The bill of particulars is to be served within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. In our opinion, these items are proper subjects for a bill of particulars and as to them the plaintiff’s motion to vacate should have been denied. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

250 A.D. 764, 295 N.Y.S. 125, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schierloh-v-kelly-nyappdiv-1937.