Schiefler v. Warner, Norcross & Judd
718 N.W.2d 349, 476 Mich. 858, 2006 Mich. LEXIS 1503
Opinion
Roger L. SCHIEFLER, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
WARNER, NORCROSS & JUDD, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 23, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court prior to the completion of the proceedings ordered by the Court of Appeals.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Schiefler v. Warner, Norcross & Judd, 718 N.W.2d 349, 476 Mich. 858, 2006 Mich. LEXIS 1503 (Mich. 2006).
718 N.W.2d 349 (Schiefler v. Warner, Norcross & Judd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.