Schieffelin v. . Hylan
This text of 125 N.E. 925 (Schieffelin v. . Hylan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs. First question certified answered in negative. Third, fourth and seventh questions answered in affirmative. Fifth question answered in negative. The public service commission has made no sufficient requisition. Second and sixth questions not answered; no opinion.
Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Chase, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin and Andbews, JJ. Absent: Hogan, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
125 N.E. 925, 227 N.Y. 593, 1919 N.Y. LEXIS 751, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schieffelin-v-hylan-ny-1919.