Schieffelin v. Hawkins

1 Daly 289
New York Court of Common Pleas·Decided January 15, 1863·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

Daly, F. J.

I have already expressed my views upon this case at Special Term in overruling the de[296]*296muvrer to the complaint, and have nothing to add to the rear sons I then gave, in support of the conclusions that the plaintiffs were entitled to the equitable relief which they seek in the action. If the action is maintainable, the injunction to restrain Hawkins from disposing of the note is a necessary part of the relief sought, and the motion to vacate it was therefore properly denied.

The order appealed from should he affirmed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schieffelin v. Hawkins, 1 Daly 289 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1863).

1 Daly 289 (Schieffelin v. Hawkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Groff v. Bliss
19 Misc. 14 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896)
Barnes v. McMullins
78 Mo. 260 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1883)