Schieffelin & Co. v. R. H. Macy & Co.

25 A.D.2d 843, 270 N.Y.S.2d 374, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4196

This text of 25 A.D.2d 843 (Schieffelin & Co. v. R. H. Macy & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schieffelin & Co. v. R. H. Macy & Co., 25 A.D.2d 843, 270 N.Y.S.2d 374, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4196 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Opinion

Order and judgment granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously reversed, on the law, with $50 eosts and disbursements to defendant-appellant, and the motion denied. There are questions of fact as to whether plaintiff has abandoned the contract and whether plaintiff is using the contract to favor some retailers over the defendant. (Millerton Agway Coop. v. Briarcliff Farms, 17 N Y 2d 57.)

Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, McNally, Steyens and Eager, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 A.D.2d 843, 270 N.Y.S.2d 374, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schieffelin-co-v-r-h-macy-co-nyappdiv-1966.