Schieffelin & Co. v. R. H. Macy & Co.
This text of 25 A.D.2d 843 (Schieffelin & Co. v. R. H. Macy & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order and judgment granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously reversed, on the law, with $50 eosts and disbursements to defendant-appellant, and the motion denied. There are questions of fact as to whether plaintiff has abandoned the contract and whether plaintiff is using the contract to favor some retailers over the defendant. (Millerton Agway Coop. v. Briarcliff Farms, 17 N Y 2d 57.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 A.D.2d 843, 270 N.Y.S.2d 374, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schieffelin-co-v-r-h-macy-co-nyappdiv-1966.