Schieder v. Burke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schieder v. Burke

257 A.D. 907, 12 N.Y.S.2d 771, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8346

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 3, 1939·Published

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The question as to whether plaintiff owned the auto in which she was riding at the time of the accident was properly submitted to the jury and the verdict of no cause for action whether based upon a finding that plaintiff owned the automobile or that defendant was free from fault is amply supported by the evidence. All concur. (The judgment is for defendant in an automobile-bus negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The question as to whether plaintiff owned the auto in which she was riding at the time of the accident was properly submitted to the jury and the verdict of no cause for action whether based upon a finding that plaintiff owned the automobile or that defendant was free from fault is amply supported by the evidence. All concur. (The judgment is for defendant in an automobile-bus negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Schieder v. Burke, 257 A.D. 907, 12 N.Y.S.2d 771, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8346 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

257 A.D. 907 (Schieder v. Burke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.