Schickling v. Post Publishing Co.

5 Ohio Law. Abs. 29
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 11, 1927
DocketNo. 19951
StatusPublished

This text of 5 Ohio Law. Abs. 29 (Schickling v. Post Publishing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schickling v. Post Publishing Co., 5 Ohio Law. Abs. 29 (Ohio 1927).

Opinion

KINKADE, J.

When the facts attending any issue in an action are admitted or the evidence in respect thereto is not in conflict, it is the duty of the trial court to charge the jury the result that must follow an application of the law to the facts so established; and where the question is whether the relation of master and servant or that of independent contractor arises by reason of such facts, the trial court should say to the jury which relation exists, and it is prejudicial error to submit the determination of that question to .the jury.

Judgment affirmed.

Marshall, CJ., Day, Allen, Robinson, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Ohio Law. Abs. 29, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schickling-v-post-publishing-co-ohio-1927.