Schickedanz Bros.-Riviera Ltd. v. Harris

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Schickedanz Bros.-Riviera Ltd. v. Harris

82 So. 3d 928, 2011 WL 2694562, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 11002

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 13, 2011·No. No. 4D10-457·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm, in part, the second amended final judgment post mandate on rehearing. We reverse that portion of the final judgment failing to award appellant prejudgment interest. We remand to the circuit court to enter an award of prejudgment interest from the date that appellant filed its counterclaim. See Ganot Corp. v. J.M.G. Constr. Corp., 560 So.2d 804, 804-05 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). The trial court did not err in awarding prejudgment interest to appellee. See Westgate Miami Beach, Ltd. v. Newport Operating Corp., 55 So.3d 567, 575 (Fla.2010).

STEVENSON, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm, in part, the second amended final judgment post mandate on rehearing. We reverse that portion of the final judgment failing to award appellant prejudgment interest. We remand to the circuit court to enter an award of prejudgment interest from the date that appellant filed its counterclaim. See Ganot Corp. v. J.M.G. Constr. Corp., 560 So.2d 804, 804-05 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). The trial court did not err in awarding prejudgment interest to appellee. See Westgate Miami Beach, Ltd. v. Newport Operating Corp., 55 So.3d 567, 575 (Fla.2010).

STEVENSON, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Schickedanz Bros.-Riviera Ltd. v. Harris, 82 So. 3d 928, 2011 WL 2694562, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 11002 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

82 So. 3d 928 (Schickedanz Bros.-Riviera Ltd. v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related