Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Schickedanz Bros.-Riviera Ltd. v. Harris

Schickedanz Bros.-Riviera Ltd. v. Harris

82 So. 3d 928, 2011 WL 2694562, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 11002
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 13, 2011
DocketNo. 4D10-457
StatusPublished

This text of 82 So. 3d 928 (Schickedanz Bros.-Riviera Ltd. v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schickedanz Bros.-Riviera Ltd. v. Harris, 82 So. 3d 928, 2011 WL 2694562, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 11002 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm, in part, the second amended final judgment post mandate on rehearing. We reverse that portion of the final judgment failing to award appellant prejudgment interest. We remand to the circuit court to enter an award of prejudgment interest from the date that appellant filed its counterclaim. See Ganot Corp. v. J.M.G. Constr. Corp., 560 So.2d 804, 804-05 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). The trial court did not err in awarding prejudgment interest to appellee. See Westgate Miami Beach, Ltd. v. Newport Operating Corp., 55 So.3d 567, 575 (Fla.2010).

STEVENSON, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Westgate Miami Beach, Ltd. v. Newport Operating Corp.
55 So. 3d 567 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2010)
Ganot Corp. v. J.M.G. Construction Corp.
560 So. 2d 804 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
82 So. 3d 928, 2011 WL 2694562, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 11002, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schickedanz-bros-riviera-ltd-v-harris-fladistctapp-2011.