Schick Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission

D.C. Circuit

Schick Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission

288 F.2d 407, 110 U.S. App. D.C. 5

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedFebruary 9, 1961

DocketNo. 15370

StatusPublished

This text of 288 F.2d 407 (Schick Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schick Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, 288 F.2d 407, 110 U.S. App. D.C. 5 (D.C. Cir. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon the authority of the decision today rendered in Sperry Rand Corp. v. Federal Trade Comm., — U.S.App.D.C. —, 288 F.2d 403, the petition for review will be dismissed in view of our holding in that case that the enforcement and penalty provisions of Public Law 86-107, 15 U.S.C.A. § 21, do not apply to cease and desist orders which are outstanding as of the date of its enactment.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon the authority of the decision today rendered in Sperry Rand Corp. v. Federal Trade Comm., — U.S.App.D.C. —, 288 F.2d 403, the petition for review will be dismissed in view of our holding in that case that the enforcement and penalty provisions of Public Law 86-107, 15 U.S.C.A. § 21, do not apply to cease and desist orders which are outstanding as of the date of its enactment.

It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

288 F.2d 407, 110 U.S. App. D.C. 5, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schick-inc-v-federal-trade-commission-cadc-1961.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack