Schiavone v. 801 S. Fulton Avenue Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schiavone v. 801 S. Fulton Avenue Co.

295 A.D.2d 493, 744 N.Y.S.2d 852, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6451

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 17, 2002

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 295 A.D.2d 493 (Schiavone v. 801 S. Fulton Avenue Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schiavone v. 801 S. Fulton Avenue Co., 295 A.D.2d 493, 744 N.Y.S.2d 852, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6451 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Murphy, J.), entered September 21, 2001, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the action as time barred.

Ordered that the order is affirmed with costs.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed the action commenced May 8, 2001, as time barred. The plaintiffs were not entitled to invoke the six-month extension contained in CPLR 205 (a) (see Markoff v South Nassau Community Hosp., 61 NY2d 283; County of Rockland v Coakley, 235 AD2d 782; Matter of Winston v Freshwater Wetlands Appeals Bd., 224 AD2d 160). Florio, J.P., Smith, Friedmann and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Murphy, J.), entered September 21, 2001, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the action as time barred.

Ordered that the order is affirmed with costs.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed the action commenced May 8, 2001, as time barred. The plaintiffs were not entitled to invoke the six-month extension contained in CPLR 205 (a) (see Markoff v South Nassau Community Hosp., 61 NY2d 283; County of Rockland v Coakley, 235 AD2d 782; Matter of Winston v Freshwater Wetlands Appeals Bd., 224 AD2d 160). Florio, J.P., Smith, Friedmann and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

295 A.D.2d 493, 744 N.Y.S.2d 852, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schiavone-v-801-s-fulton-avenue-co-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack