Schiavone Construction Co. v. Merola ex rel. Estate of Merola

Second Circuit

Schiavone Construction Co. v. Merola ex rel. Estate of Merola

848 F.2d 43

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided June 9, 1988·No. No. 1190, Docket 88-7162·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Leonard B. Sand, J., dismissing plaintiff’s complaint brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and holding that plaintiff’s acquittal in the underlying criminal proceedings precluded recovery of the extra expenses borne by plaintiff in its efforts to neutralize defendant’s prejudicial pretrial statements. The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons given by Judge Sand in his opinion reported at 678 F.Supp. 64 (S.D.N.Y.1988).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Leonard B. Sand, J., dismissing plaintiff’s complaint brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and holding that plaintiff’s acquittal in the underlying criminal proceedings precluded recovery of the extra expenses borne by plaintiff in its efforts to neutralize defendant’s prejudicial pretrial statements. The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons given by Judge Sand in his opinion reported at 678 F.Supp. 64 (S.D.N.Y.1988).

Schiavone Construction Co. v. Merola ex rel. Estate of Merola, 848 F.2d 43 (2d Cir. 1988).

Pincite

848 F.2d 43 (Schiavone Construction Co. v. Merola ex rel. Estate of Merola) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related