Schiavone Construction Co. v. Merola ex rel. Estate of Merola

848 F.2d 43
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedJune 9, 1988
DocketNo. 1190, Docket 88-7162
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 848 F.2d 43 (Schiavone Construction Co. v. Merola ex rel. Estate of Merola) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schiavone Construction Co. v. Merola ex rel. Estate of Merola, 848 F.2d 43 (2d Cir. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Leonard B. Sand, J., dismissing plaintiff’s complaint brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and holding that plaintiff’s acquittal in the underlying criminal proceedings precluded recovery of the extra expenses borne by plaintiff in its efforts to neutralize defendant’s prejudicial pretrial statements. The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons given by Judge Sand in his opinion reported at 678 F.Supp. 64 (S.D.N.Y.1988).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schiavone Construction Co. v. Merola
848 F.2d 43 (Second Circuit, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
848 F.2d 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schiavone-construction-co-v-merola-ex-rel-estate-of-merola-ca2-1988.