Schiavetti v. Power

17 A.D.2d 710, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8441

This text of 17 A.D.2d 710 (Schiavetti v. Power) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schiavetti v. Power, 17 A.D.2d 710, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8441 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Opinion

Order entered on August 24, 1962, unanimously modified on the law and the facts to the extent of declaring valid the designating petitions as to John R. Hope and Patricia A. Keenan and otherwise affirmed, without costs. The improprieties of candidates Hope and Keenan were not of such a character as to warrant invalidating the petitions as to them (Matter of Johnson v. Westall, 208 Misc. 360, affd. 286 App. Div. 966). This cannot be said concerning the conduct of candidate Haughey as found by the Referee. (Matter of Weisberger v. Cohen, 260 App. Div. 392.) Motion to dispense with printing granted. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Weisberger v. Cohen
260 A.D. 392 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1940)
Johnson v. Westall
286 A.D. 966 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1955)
Johnson v. Westall
208 Misc. 360 (New York Supreme Court, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 A.D.2d 710, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8441, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schiavetti-v-power-nyappdiv-1962.